|
Some checks failed
Veza CI / Backend (Go) (push) Failing after 0s
Veza CI / Frontend (Web) (push) Failing after 0s
Veza CI / Rust (Stream Server) (push) Failing after 0s
Security Scan / Secret Scanning (gitleaks) (push) Failing after 0s
Veza CI / Notify on failure (push) Failing after 0s
Self-review of the v1.0.6.2 hotfix surfaced that
distribution.checkEligibility silently swallowed
subscription.ErrSubscriptionNoPayment as "ineligible, no extra info",
so a user with a fantôme subscription trying to submit a distribution
got "Distribution requires Creator or Premium plan" — misleading, the
user has a plan but no payment. checkEligibility now propagates the
error so the handler can surface "Your subscription is not linked to
a payment. Complete payment to enable distribution."
Security is unchanged — the gate still refuses. This is a UX clarity
fix for honest-path users who landed in the fantôme state via a
broken payment flow.
Also:
- Closure timestamp added to axis-1 P0.12 ("closed 2026-04-17 in
v1.0.6.2 (commit
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| axis-1-correctness.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| v107-plan.md | ||
VEZA Audit — 2026-04
Scope — VEZA backend (Go) + web (TypeScript). TALAS software (firmware, PCB reverse-engineering pipeline) is out of scope and will be audited separately when its phase stabilises.
Source state — commits up to
a57bb6f78(v1.0.6.1, 2026-04-17).Auditor — Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context).
Axes
| # | File | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | axis-1-correctness.md — correctness / accounting |
✅ delivered |
| 2 | axis-2-state-machines.md — transition matrix + illegal-transition tests |
🔲 pending v1.0.7 |
| 3 | axis-3-security.md — attack surface (signatures, rate limits, authz, secrets) |
🔲 pending |
| 4 | axis-4-tests.md — coverage vs reality, failure-injection gap |
🔲 pending |
| 5 | axis-5-debt.md — documented debt vs hidden debt (TODO/FIXME inventory) |
🔲 pending |
Axis 2 is gated on v1.0.7 landing first — otherwise the transition matrix
captures a v1.0.6.1 snapshot that's immediately stale. See
v107-plan.md for the sequencing.
Reading conventions
Every finding cites file:line evidence. Structure:
### P{0|1|2}.N — short title
**Evidence** — concrete cites
**Consequence** — what breaks today / tomorrow
**Action** — what to do, with enough detail that an implementer can start
**Criticity** — P0 / P1 / P2 / wontfix (with justification)
P0 = fix within v1.0.7 or earlier (ledger diverges today, or a v1.0.7 commitment is structurally blocked). P1 = v1.0.7 target. Operational visibility / correctness hardening. P2 = v1.0.8+. Nice-to-have. wontfix = justified non-action.
Info needed from ops (not determinable from code)
Tracked in axis-1-correctness.md.
Absence of answers becomes a finding in its own right.
Derived deliverables
v107-plan.md— sequencing, dependencies and relative effort for the axis-1 P0 findings + the CHANGELOG-parked v1.0.7 items. Read this before picking up v1.0.7 work.